What To Look For

Lately, I've heard a lot in the news about what bad teahcers do in classrooms, and how detrimental they can be to a student's education.  Unfortunately, there isn't nearly as much discussion as to what good teachers do, and how valuable they are to the education of those same students.  Lots of research agrees on one thing-- a good teacher makes the most difference in whether a student is successful or not-- more than SES, more than attendance, more than behavior, more than parental involvement, more than any other factor. 

I think that a good teacher asks his or her self these questions before each and every lesson:

- What do I expect students to know and be able to do as a result of your lesson?
- How do I “hook” the students in at the beginning?
- How do I make sure students are engaged throughout the lesson?
- How do I know students are understanding the lesson?

For me, being a good teacher amounts to three things:  Clarity, Continuity, and Concurrency.  Let me explain what I mean by these three:

Clarity is about one question:  Is the teacher clear about exactly what his students should do?  If a teacher doesn’t know why he’s doing an activity, you can bet that the kids won’t, either.  If there’s no objective in mind, whatever learning occurs will be accidental, haphazard, unpredictable.  Classrooms without clear expectations for behavior, attitude, and achievement will have kids mired in mediocrity, at best. 

Continuity is about putting it all together– one of the most important things a teacher does is make coherence out of complicated, difficult subject matter.  A teacher showing continuity begins class with an opening deisgned to pique interest not only for that day’s lesson, but as part of a think-back to the day before.  At the end of a class, she does the opposite– make sure students understand all that was done that day, and link it to what’s coming the next day.  And most importantly, she doesn’t move on if her students didn’t get it!  A teacher with engaged students will also be consistent in policies– if you’re wishy-washy from one day to the next about how things go down in your classroom, guessing your mood will be distracting.  Good teachers are also continuous learners– you can’t be finished learning when you’re done your master’s or a workshop or a seminar.

Concurrency is maybe the hardest-to-pin-down of the three because it describes something that’s tricky to articulate: “With-it-ness.”  We all know people who are “out of it” and people who are really “with it.”  That’s not unique to teaching.  But there’s more to concurrency than just being “with it.”  Concurrency is about being in the moment, whether we’re talking about in the classroom moment, with our students, engaged in them as we want them to be engaged with us… it’s also about being in the moment with the world, and being aware of what’s going on out there– the issues and problems students in your community have, the digital tools they constantly use as fluently as we drive our cars, the unique structure of their social lives and how different it is than that of kids just 10 years ago– and certainly how different it is than most of their teachers’ K-12 years.  Being concurrent means being in touch– in touch with the individuals, the human beings in front of us, the community in which they live, and the world in which they’re situated.  Concurrency gives you credibility– everyone, especially kids, knows who’s with it and who’s out of it.

I hope this gives you a sense of what I consider to be good teaching.  Please add your own observations.  Comment, or write a new post yourself!  See me for help with this, if necessary.

-Marc